[ View Full Version Of This Page ]

New to forum- What do you prefer!!

All Forums » Nitrous, Super Chargers, & Turbos » New to forum- What do you prefer!!

lazypanda
4/16/2008 6:59:20 PM
well guys, im new to the forum, and i got a 2003 accord 2.4L, i was thinking what would you guys rather prefer for an accord, turbo or supercharger. O the negative draw back is, its automatic :( i know i know lol. I appreciate you taking the time to guide me to a goal :) 
BlkCurrantKord
4/17/2008 5:12:25 AM
Supercharger
gomarlins3
4/17/2008 11:21:43 AM
I have no experience with a turbo, but my SC has worked well.
00AccordGuy
4/17/2008 4:23:56 PM
for an automatic get a supercharger
00AccordLX5spd
4/18/2008 9:17:01 AM
supercharger if you are automatic
KevinAccord
4/24/2008 11:30:59 AM
i dare to say otherwise... (i don't mean is better, but i'll prefer turbo)
KevinAccord
4/24/2008 11:37:42 AM
just curious, why SC? is it b/c it doesn't put so much stress on the tranny?
HORSEPOWERJUNKIE2007
4/24/2008 1:51:29 PM
supercharged all the way....j series all the way
KevinAccord
4/24/2008 4:04:00 PM
anyone mind telling why SC? turbo is way cooler, but I THINK (not sure), performance wise, SC are more effective...(?)
finch13
4/24/2008 5:06:47 PM
Turbo FTW. Why take power to make power?
19Accord97
4/24/2008 6:59:06 PM
quote:

ORIGINAL: finch13

Turbo FTW. Why take power to make power?

 
Thats exactly what I say when people say supercharger. 
KevinAccord
4/25/2008 9:04:01 AM
thank yooooouuuuuuu!!!! i prefer Turbo.... i guess it's just what u like rather than whats better (that is, if your looking for style rather than performance, or a bit of the 2)
sUbLiMe96
4/25/2008 9:58:22 AM
Um, I may be wrong, but isnt a Supercharger more reliable than going Turbo (i remember reading this somewhere)?
oh and for the Tranny deal, i would "think" boost is boost,  so wouldnt the stress on Tranny be the same?
finch13
4/25/2008 11:29:14 AM
quote:

ORIGINAL: sUbLiMe96

Um, I may be wrong, but isnt a Supercharger more reliable than going Turbo (i remember reading this somewhere)?
oh and for the Tranny deal, i would "think" boost is boost,  so wouldnt the stress on Tranny be the same?

 
No. They put different stressed on the pistons and crank. I have a 10-page article in a Super Street at home comparing the pros and cons of turbo, supercharging, nitrous and NA. I should scan that article to my photobucket or find it online...
live2rice
4/25/2008 11:34:59 AM
the turbo supercharger debate has been raging forever, i doubt we will solve it in this thread. 
 
I am no baised one way or the other, i have seen some really nice turboed cars and some really nice supercharged cars. 
 
So with that being said my vote goes to N/A. 
 
I would say go turbo, but either way would work
 
however i also think automatic trannies are worthless to put any sort of power through. 
 
 
KevinAccord
4/25/2008 12:03:22 PM
Well, i disagree on the last part... is not as good, but it's still worth it... (looking foward to getting $$$ to make the MT swap, (H22 tranny)).
 
I guess the turbo or SC depend on the car... I'll agree w/ you on that one...
finch13
4/25/2008 3:09:59 PM
I found the super street article. Turbo is probably the least expensive option, all things said and done.
http://www.superstreetonline.com/techarticles/130_0708_engine_tuning_comparison/index.html

EDIT: Enjoy the pictures of the girl as well!
Related Threads

[ View Full Version Of This Page ]

Return to the Honda Accord Forum home page - Archive Home