who would you vote for ?
#23
01-14-2008, 07:59 PM
RE: who would you vote for ?
ORIGINAL: honda97valdeez
Easy TayHas! Her name is spelled Hilarity.
00- x100 on Gunny!!!!
academic- Gunny wouldlead troops to battle! And the entire world would be scared sh*%less of him because of his
forceful personality, not GW's stupidity.
Easy TayHas! Her name is spelled Hilarity.
00- x100 on Gunny!!!!
academic- Gunny wouldlead troops to battle! And the entire world would be scared sh*%less of him because of his
forceful personality, not GW's stupidity.
#24
01-14-2008, 08:01 PM
RE: who would you vote for ?
Roger. Who needs censors when we censor ourselves?
(maybe except Trav20
lol!)
(maybe except Trav20
lol!)
#26
01-14-2008, 08:13 PM
RE: who would you vote for ?
ORIGINAL: RTexasF
It is TOTALLY obvious that you did not read the original thread. Sharpen your reading skills and try it again. To top it all off you spelled her name wrong.....Good Grief Chiild!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ORIGINAL: Trav20
Flame me if you want. If I could vote I'd vote for Hilary.
Lol falkore I love idiocracy. I think that movie is going trying to tell us that is how our world will end up to be...STUPID.
Flame me if you want. If I could vote I'd vote for Hilary.
Lol falkore I love idiocracy. I think that movie is going trying to tell us that is how our world will end up to be...STUPID.
Well since we are talking about THAT kind of Prime minister/Pres. then i'd vote for Donnie Darko. Anyone who will burn down patrick swayze's house can be my pres
#27
01-14-2008, 08:21 PM
RE: who would you vote for ?
Happy birthday dude![sm=bling.gif] Get yersef somethin' nice! FTW!!
I bet most of us would not participate in a truthful political discussion-too much temptation to incite the "opposition" and play devil's advocate.
D D is an acceptable candidate for sure.
I bet most of us would not participate in a truthful political discussion-too much temptation to incite the "opposition" and play devil's advocate.
D D is an acceptable candidate for sure.
#28
01-14-2008, 08:29 PM
RE: who would you vote for ?
Tracy morgan in Totally Awesome. just someone to make us laugh everyday on the news.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OrngtVuexXo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OrngtVuexXo
#29
01-15-2008, 04:04 AM
RE: who would you vote for ?
ORIGINAL: Tony1M
Jack Ryan(HarrisonFord)from "Clear and Present Danger".
And while we're at it, from the same movie, get John Clark (Willem Dafoe) on board the ticket for VP.
Jack Ryan(HarrisonFord)from "Clear and Present Danger".
And while we're at it, from the same movie, get John Clark (Willem Dafoe) on board the ticket for VP.
#30
01-15-2008, 02:34 PM
RE: who would you vote for ?
ORIGINAL: academic
Sounds like a dream ticket but dont forget that Jack Ryan is SIR Jack Ryan so once again you would be ruled by British aristocracy [the story about Irish terrorists]
ORIGINAL: Tony1M
Jack Ryan(HarrisonFord)from "Clear and Present Danger".
And while we're at it, from the same movie, get John Clark (Willem Dafoe) on board the ticket for VP.
Jack Ryan(HarrisonFord)from "Clear and Present Danger".
And while we're at it, from the same movie, get John Clark (Willem Dafoe) on board the ticket for VP.
Anyway, if you wanted to kill any hope of Jackbecoming CEO, pointing out that heis part of the Biritish aristocracy is the perfect way to do it. Too bad. The cat is out of the bag and it isgoing to be mightytough getting it back in there.
I find it interesting that in someof the Jack Ryan movies there are two villains, and one of them ison "our" side. In the case of "Clear and Present Danger", I thought that the latter bore an uncannyresemblance (in attitude, if not in action)to his presentreal-life counterpart.
(I cannot resist abit of OT here. I think that one would be well-served to ask oneselfwhich of thereal-life candidates most resembles Jack Ryan and, regardless of whether one believes that that person is "electable", vote for that person in theupcoming election.I guess hoping for that is futile, but I cannothelp wondering how voters wouldvote if they went to theirvoting boothsnot knowingthe results of"surveys" or "polls" thathad beenconducted within a year ofelection day.Wouldn't it be just awful having to choose a candidatenot knowing who's "ahead" -having to cast one's ballot basedsolely on what the candidates had said? Whatfunction, orexactly whom,do these last-minutepolls serve, anyway?)