Should I replace my 2000 Accord?
Not really a technical question, the car is a 2.3L, 5mt with 275K and runs well. Uses about 1 quart of oil every 5k miles, which I believe is reasonable. The car has always been serviced according to the maintenance requirements. The only reasons that I consider replacing it is for the new safety features. Not really a fan of any Honda products, CVT's, turbo's on small engines. I've considered the Mazda 6 or even the 3 because the size is very size comparable to the gen 6 Honda. I want a NA engine, preferable 4 cylinder and either a stick or conventional automatic transmission. I know that Mazda is going to introduce a new CUV sometime next year, the CX-30. That may be interesting. I'm in no rush to buy anything, so I'll give that a look when it comes out. Interested in any input for alternatives, or should I keep driving the old Accord, thanks.
It depends what modern features you want on your car and also your budget. I'd say test drive a variety of cars and try some different setups, like the NA Kia vs their small turbo engine to feel the difference.
Not really a technical question, the car is a 2.3L, 5mt with 275K and runs well. Uses about 1 quart of oil every 5k miles, which I believe is reasonable. The car has always been serviced according to the maintenance requirements. The only reasons that I consider replacing it is for the new safety features. Not really a fan of any Honda products, CVT's, turbo's on small engines. I've considered the Mazda 6 or even the 3 because the size is very size comparable to the gen 6 Honda. I want a NA engine, preferable 4 cylinder and either a stick or conventional automatic transmission. I know that Mazda is going to introduce a new CUV sometime next year, the CX-30. That may be interesting. I'm in no rush to buy anything, so I'll give that a look when it comes out. Interested in any input for alternatives, or should I keep driving the old Accord, thanks.
That said, I would rather drive my 2006 TL 6MT over either of those two cars.
Good advise from both, thanks. I have driven the Mazda 3 hb and the CX-5. I agree that the 6mt in the 3 is definitely nice. I thought the car felt a bit small, but you are right the utility with the seats down provide more than I'll ever need in a car. I thought the CX-5 was a little big for a DD. That TL is one car, I wish I had purchased back in '06. The CX-30 is a CUV based upon the Mazda 3 hatch.
Good advise from both, thanks. I have driven the Mazda 3 hb and the CX-5. I agree that the 6mt in the 3 is definitely nice. I thought the car felt a bit small, but you are right the utility with the seats down provide more than I'll ever need in a car. I thought the CX-5 was a little big for a DD. That TL is one car, I wish I had purchased back in '06. The CX-30 is a CUV based upon the Mazda 3 hatch.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
paulnguyen
General Tech Help
10
May 25, 2014 08:55 AM
paumcd
Engine & Internal
5
Dec 10, 2011 09:32 AM
AndrewRWC
General Tech Help
2
Aug 31, 2006 10:11 PM



