Off Topic A place for you car junkies to boldly post off topic.

How much fuel consume your Honda Accord?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 28, 2013 | 08:51 PM
  #31  
kayweb's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 185
From: Olympia, WA
Default

What I'm talking about is fully shutting the engine off, in order to maintain speed down gentler hills.
 
Old Jun 29, 2013 | 08:38 AM
  #32  
shipo's Avatar
Super Moderator
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,070
From: Southern New Hampshire
Default

Why on earth would you do that?
 
Old Jul 1, 2013 | 03:04 AM
  #33  
kayweb's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 185
From: Olympia, WA
Default

Because the weight of the car allows it to maintain speed. see here
 
Old Jul 1, 2013 | 09:17 AM
  #34  
shipo's Avatar
Super Moderator
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,070
From: Southern New Hampshire
Default

Originally Posted by kayweb
Because the weight of the car allows it to maintain speed. see here
What you're advocating is illegal in all 50 States and Canada. Why? Because quite simply, it is unsafe.

When you suddenly need a burst of power (or power steering or power assist brakes) to avoid an accident and you find yourself crunching into a truck or something that unexpectedly pulled out in front of you while you were free-wheeling down a hill with the engine switched off, don't say we didn't warn you.
 
Old Jul 1, 2013 | 02:29 PM
  #35  
kayweb's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 185
From: Olympia, WA
Default

I am aware.
I hug the right lane, I always pay attention to the lanes in front of me, my maximum speed never reaches anything higher than 60, I cover the brake pedal the entire time, and the brake booster holds enough vacuum with the engine switched off to fully stop the car on a 7% grade at 60mph without losing power assist. Also (at freeway speed) power steering really isn't that crucial for me.
It is dangerous, but not much more than using a cell phone, speeding, having a prolonged conversation with passengers, etc.
I will continue to be careful.
 
Old Jul 1, 2013 | 10:00 PM
  #36  
stang99x's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 47
Default

Originally Posted by kayweb
What I'm talking about is fully shutting the engine off, in order to maintain speed down gentler hills.
Do you believe everything you read on the internet? That effective achieves zilch. Beyond being dangerous, fuel injected engines are efficient enough that doing that does nothing to increase MPG, if not costing more becuase of constant restarts. Perhaps in a Prius, as the example uses, when the engine is on electrical power anyway it works, but not with a straight internal combustion engine.

And I was getting 28 on the interstate with a 2005 V6
 
Old Jul 2, 2013 | 03:31 PM
  #37  
kayweb's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 185
From: Olympia, WA
Default

When I can travel a mile, two miles, three miles (I believe my current record is 3.6) without using any gasoline, I would offer that it would increase the number of miles I would get per gallon, simply by virtue of the engine not using any. You roll further with the engine off than under injector shutoff at the very least. I'm not saying it's the safest method of freeway driving, but it doesn't really matter to me, I save a bit of money.
Here's my mileage log
 
Old Jul 2, 2013 | 04:02 PM
  #38  
MysticBlueEX's Avatar
Almost A Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 262
From: Orchard Park NY USA
Default

Originally Posted by kayweb
When I can travel a mile, two miles, three miles (I believe my current record is 3.6) without using any gasoline, I would offer that it would increase the number of miles I would get per gallon, simply by virtue of the engine not using any. You roll further with the engine off than under injector shutoff at the very least. I'm not saying it's the safest method of freeway driving, but it doesn't really matter to me, I save a bit of money.
Here's my mileage log
You are not safe. Some would say not too smart.
How about just losing 25 lbs of body weight, ditch the back seat and spare tire? Probably be the same result. only safer.
Plus if you lose 25 lbs, you spend less on food, therefore saving money over course of your life. not just while driving.
 
Old Jul 3, 2013 | 01:45 AM
  #39  
WheelBrokerAng's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 30,424
From: Canton/Massillon, Ohio 44646
Default

Originally Posted by MysticBlueEX
You are not safe. Some would say not too smart.
How about just losing 25 lbs of body weight, ditch the back seat and spare tire? Probably be the same result. only safer.
Plus if you lose 25 lbs, you spend less on food, therefore saving money over course of your life. not just while driving.

|I see your point there Mystic
 
Old Jul 3, 2013 | 02:26 AM
  #40  
kayweb's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 185
From: Olympia, WA
Default

I am 6' and 130lbs (vegan). If I lost 25lbs I would most likely die. I already ditched the spare tire, along with a few other parts of the car that I don't use (windshield washer reservoir, carpeting in the back, A/C, etc). That being said, I understand where you're coming from. I understand the risks involved, and I am willing to take responsibility for whatever the consequences of my driving style are.
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:29 AM.