Some SERIOUS pwnage!!!! OMFG!!!!!
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,322
From: Brandon, MS
RE: Some SERIOUS pwnage!!!! OMFG!!!!!
I guess I should have said "I'd never be dumb enough to go on TV for court, especially in her courtroom" haha. Yeah I would never be on one of those TV court shows.
Been Around A Long Time Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,110
From:
RE: Some SERIOUS pwnage!!!! OMFG!!!!!
i agree with what she said, but i disagree with her ruling. i didnt see the whole thing, but it looks like she ruled on behalf of the plaintiff because she didnt like the defendant, and thats wrong.
RE: Some SERIOUS pwnage!!!! OMFG!!!!!
ORIGINAL: RTexasF
Good for her! That arrogant young plick needed his |||||||||||||||**BUTT**handed to him and she sure did that.
Good for her! That arrogant young plick needed his |||||||||||||||**BUTT**handed to him and she sure did that.
RE: Some SERIOUS pwnage!!!! OMFG!!!!!
I always keep it in track, and most of the guys including you do too.
We be the Good Forum on the web...always gals and gentleman..that' what we hear from the other forum members when they come in here..
We be the Good Forum on the web...always gals and gentleman..that' what we hear from the other forum members when they come in here..
Thread Starter
|
Been Around A Long Time Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,213
From: Wayne, NJ
RE: Some SERIOUS pwnage!!!! OMFG!!!!!
^^^ LOL .... been a while Ed!!! Good to see that you are feeling better!!!
nafango --- she ruled based on the fact that the lawyers testimony contradicted his own written statement.
nafango --- she ruled based on the fact that the lawyers testimony contradicted his own written statement.