New Member Area Are you new? WELCOME! Check in, tell us about yourself and your ride.

Getting a 2006 Accord in ~Week: AT or MT?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 11:23 PM
  #11  
Stanley9875's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 160
From: Upland, CA
Default

Yea, I got my Accord with 97,000 miles, and it runs extremely good. The transmission on mine is fine (auto like I said before).

-$tanley
 
Old Feb 23, 2009 | 10:21 PM
  #12  
erivkin10's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 15
From:
Default

I think you will find more than a 2-3 mpg difference in mileage between an AT and MT '06 Accord. I have an '06 EX-L 4 cylinder MT5. The car has about 40k miles on it. I purchased it with just over 30k. This past summer I averaged 39 mpg on a trip that was mostly highway driving. The worst mileage to date is about 28 mpg mostly around town in the middle of winter; temps in the teens and 20's fahrenheit.

I agree with the other comments already expressed regarding driveability. Driving an MT is a more engaging driving experience. Having driven MT equipped vehicles most of my life, I would also add that engines last longer as do brakes.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JOSHENATOR
Off Topic
2
Apr 12, 2013 05:30 PM
engtaz
General Tech Help
4
Jul 1, 2011 02:10 PM
Underworld
Headers, Intake, & Exhaust
0
Feb 28, 2009 06:54 PM
kahnvict850
Suspension
13
Aug 20, 2008 09:22 PM
whitelotus420
Engine & Internal
14
Jun 20, 2007 07:09 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:37 PM.