New top end vs reman engine
#13
While it is true I've never even seen a 2.7 liter V6 mill, I was kinda-sorta under the impression both the engine and the transmission were pretty much made of aluminum (i.e. heads, block, tranny case), I cannot figure out how that could be so heavy a cherry picker would have an issue with it. That said, the last time I pulled a motor with a cherry picker was when good-old American iron was used to make V8 engines, so maybe the cherry pickers of that era were more robust.
#16
You might run into some problems because a 97 is obd2 and 95 is obd1. Likely the distributor will have different wiring.
But not too many people ever messed with the v6 accords(I know I didn't) so there isn't too much knowledge out there about it.
But not too many people ever messed with the v6 accords(I know I didn't) so there isn't too much knowledge out there about it.
#18
Ok so I ran a better compression test, cold and wot
Here are the numbers
1 - 140
3 - 90
5 - 135
2 - 140
4 - 130
6 - 135
I'm thinking since the newer engine is a 95 , I may just go ahead and do a top end rebuild on mine.( A lot cheaper) Maybe I can get 500k miles out of this car.
Thoughts?
Here are the numbers
1 - 140
3 - 90
5 - 135
2 - 140
4 - 130
6 - 135
I'm thinking since the newer engine is a 95 , I may just go ahead and do a top end rebuild on mine.( A lot cheaper) Maybe I can get 500k miles out of this car.
Thoughts?